VMware Increases Price Again

VMware increases price again. As per VMware pricing FAQ, the following pricing model will be in effect on April 1, 2016.

vSphere with Operations Management Enterprise Plus from US$4,245/CPU to US$4,395/CPU

VMware vCenter Server™ Standard from US$4,995/Instance to US$5,995/Instance

vSphere with Operations Management Enterprise Plus now includes enhancements to Workload Placement, and vCenter Server™ Standard now includes 25 Operating System Instances of VMware vRealize® Log Insight™ for vCenter.

vSphere Enterprise and vSphere with Operations Management Enterprise customers also entitled for a 50% discount on optional upgrade to vSphere Enterprise Plus and vSphere with Operations Management Enterprise Plus. This offer is valid until June 25, 2016.

Relevant Information

VMware Licensing FAQ

Hyper-v Server 2016 licensing FAQ

Windows Server 2016 datasheet

Windows Server 2016

VMware vSphere 6.0 VS Microsoft Hyper-v Server 2012 R2

Since the emergence of vSphere 6.0, I would like to write an article on vSphere 6.0 vs Windows Server 2012 R2. I collected vSphere 6.0 features from few blogs and VMware community forum. Note that vSphere 6.0 is in beta program which means VMware can amend anything before final release. New functionalities of vSphere 6.0 beta are already available in Windows Server 2012 R2. So let’s have a quick look on both virtualization products.

Features vSphere 6.0 Hyper-v Server 2012 R2
Certificates

 

Certificate Authority Active Directory Certificate Services
Certificate Store Certificate Store in Windows OS
Single Sign on VMware retained SSO 2.0 for vSphere 5.5 Active Directory Domain Services
Database vPostgres database for VC Appliance up to 8 vCenter Microsoft SQL Server

No Limitation

Management Tools Web Client & VI

VMware retained VI

SCVMM Console & Hyper-v Manager
Installer Combined single installer with all input upfront Combined single installer with all input upfront
vMotion Long distance Migration up to 100+ms RTTs Multisite Hyper-v Cluster and Live Migration
Storage Migration Storage vMotion with shared and unshared storage Hyper-v Live Storage Migration between local and shared storage
Combined Cloud Products Platform Services Controller (PSC) includes vCenter, vCOPs, vCloud Director, vCoud Automation Microsoft System Center combined App Controller, Configuration Manager, Data Protection Manager, Operations Manager, Orchestrator, Service Manager, Virtual Machine Manager
Service Registration View the services that are running in the system. Windows Services
Licensing Platform Services Controller (PSC) includes Licensing Volume Activation Role in Windows Server 2012 R2
Virtual Datacenters A Virtual Datacenter aggregates CPU, Memory, Storage and Network resources. Provision CPU, Memory, Storage and network using create Cloud wizard

Another key feature to be compared here that those who are planning to procure FC Tape library and maintain a virtual backup server note that vSphere doesn’t support FC Tape even with NPIV and Hyper-v support FC Tape using NPIV.

References:

http://www.wooditwork.com/2014/08/27/whats-new-vsphere-6-0-vcenter-esxi/

https://araihan.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/vmware-vs-hyper-v-can-microsoft-make-history-again/

https://araihan.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/microsofts-hyper-v-server-2012-and-system-center-2012-unleash-ko-punch-to-vmware/

https://araihan.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/hyper-v-server-2016-whats-new/

VMware vs Hyper-v: Can Microsoft Make History Again?

In 1852 Karl Marx published “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon”. In his book, Karl Marx quotes “that history repeats itself, “the first as tragedy, then as farce”, referring respectively to Napoleon I and to his nephew Louis Napoleon (Napoleon III).

Here I am not talking about Karl Marx, I am not a specialist on this matter. I am a computer geek. So Why I am refer to Karl Marx? I believe above remarks can be connected to a history between Microsoft and Novell.

In my past blog I compared VMware and Hyper-v:

http://microsoftguru.com.au/2013/01/24/microsofts-hyper-v-server-2012-and-system-center-2012-unleash-ko-punch-to-vmware/

http://microsoftguru.com.au/2013/09/14/vsphere-5-5-is-catching-up-with-hyper-v-2012-r2/

http://microsoftguru.com.au/2013/04/07/is-vmwares-fate-heading-towards-novell/

I found some similar articles echoed by other commentator:

http://blogs.gartner.com/david_cappuccio/2009/06/30/just-a-thought-will-vmware-become-the-next-novell/

http://virtualizedgeek.com/2012/12/04/is-vmware-headed-the-slow-painful-death-of-novell/

Here is Gartner Inc.’s verdict:

http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1GJA88J&ct=130628&st=sb

http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1LV8IX1&ct=131016&st=sb

So the question is; can Microsoft defeat VMware? Can Microsoft make history again? Here is why I believe Microsoft will make history once again regardless what VMware fan boy think. Let start….

What’s New in Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V

Microsoft has traditionally put out point releases to its server operating systems about every two years. Windows Server operating systems is no longer a traditional operating systems. This is cloud OS in true terms and uses. Let’s see what’s new in Windows Server 2012 R2 in terms of virtualization.

· New Generation 2 Virtual Machines

· Automatic Server OS Activation inside VMs

· Upgrade and Live Migration Improvements in Windows Server 2012 R2

· Online VHDX Virtual Disk Resize

· Live VM Export and Clone

· Linux Guest V Enhancements

· Storage Quality of Service ( QoS )

· Guest Clustering with Shared VHDXs

· Hyper-V Replica Site-to-Site Replication Enhancements

Generation 2 VMs

Hyper-V in Windows Server 2012 R2 supports the concept of a totally new architecture based on modern hardware with no emulated devices. This makes it possible to add a number of new features, such as secure boot for VMs and booting off of virtual SCSI or virtual network adapters.

VM Direct Connect

In Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V with the addition of VM Direct Connect allows a direct remote desktop connection to any running VM over what’s now called the VM bus. It’s also integrated into the Hyper-V management experience.

Extend replication to a third site

Hyper-V Replica in Windows Server 2012 is currently limited to a single replication target. This makes it difficult to support scenarios like a service provider wanting to act both as a target for a customer to replicate and a source to replicate to another offsite facility. Windows Server 2012 R2 and Hyper-V now provide a tertiary replication capability to support just such a scenario. By the same token, enterprises can now save one replica in-house and push a second replica off-site.

Compression for faster migration

Two new options in Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V help improve the performance of live migrations. The first is the ability to enable compression on the data to reduce the total number of bytes transmitted over the wire. The obvious caveat is that tapping CPU resources for data compression could potentially impact other operations, so you’ll need to take that into consideration. The second option, SMB Direct, requires network adapters that support RDMA. Microsoft’s advice: If you have 10 GB available, use RDMA (10x improvement); otherwise, use compression (2x improvement). Compression is the default choice and it works for the large majority of use cases.

Online VM exporting and cloning

It’s now possible to export or clone a running VM from System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012 R2 with a few mouse clicks. As with pretty much anything related to managing Windows Server 2012, you can accomplish the same task using Windows PowerShell.

Online VHDX resizing

In Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V, it is not possible to resize a virtual hard disk attached to a running VM. Windows Server 2012 R2 removes this restriction, making it possible to not only expand but even reduce the size of the virtual disk (VHDX format only) without stopping the running VM.

Storage QoS

Windows Server 2012 R2 includes the ability to limit individual VMs to a specific level of I/O throughput. The IOPS are measured by monitoring the actual disk rate to and from the attached virtual hard drives. If you have applications capable of consuming large amounts of I/O, you’ll want to consider this setting to ensure that a single I/O-hungry VM won’t starve neighbor VMs or take down the entire host.

Dynamic Memory support for Linux

In the Windows Server 2012 R2 release, Hyper-V gains the ability to dynamically expand the amount of memory available to a running VM. This capability is especially handy for any Linux workload (notably Web servers) where the amount of memory needed by the VM changes over time. Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V also brings Windows Server backups to Linux guests.

Shared VHDX

With Windows Server R2 Hyper-V, Windows guest clusters (think traditional Windows Server failover clustering but using a pair of VMs) no longer require an iSCSI or Fibre Channel SAN, but can be configured using commodity storage: namely a shared VHDX file stored on a Cluster Shared Volume. Note that while the clustered VMs can be live migrated as per usual, a live storage migration of the VHDX file requires one of the cluster nodes to be taken offline.

Bigger Bang for the Buck: Licensing Windows Server 2012 R2

The Windows Server 2012 R2 product is streamlined and simple, making it easy for customers to choose the edition that is right for their needs.

Datacenter edition – Unlimited Windows Server 2012 R2 virtualization license.

Standard edition 2 virtualized server license or lightly virtualized environments.

Essentials edition for small businesses with up to 25 users running on servers with up to two processors.

Foundation edition for small businesses with up to 15 users running on single processor servers.

Edition

Feature comparison

Licensing model

Server Pricing*

Datacenter

Unlimited virtual OSE

All features

Processor + CAL

$6,155

Standard

Two virtual OSE

All features

Processor + CAL

$882

Essentials

2 processor

One OSE

Limited features

Server

25 user limit

$501

Foundation

1 processor

Limited features

Server

15 user limit

OEM Only

Client Access Licenses (CALs) will continue to be required for access to Windows Server 2012 R2 servers and management access licenses continue to be required for endpoints being managed by System Center. You need Windows Server 2012 CAL to access Windows Server 2012. You also need CAL to access Remote Desktop Services (RDS) and Active Directory Rights Management Services (AD RMS).

What’s New SCVMM 2012 R2

· Public Cloud for Service Provider using Windows Azure 

· Private Cloud with System Center 2012 R2 VMM

· Any storage approach- Use any kind of Storage: DAS, SAN, NAS, Windows Server 2012 File Server, Scale-out File Server Cluster

· Networking – Management of physical network switches via OMI as well as virtual network infrastructure ( PVLANs, NV-GRE Virtualized Networks, NV-GRE Gateways )

· Virtualization host agnostic – Intel/AMD/OEM Hardware running Windows Server 2012/R2/2008 R2 Hyper-V, VMware or Citrix XenServer

· Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch

· Bootstrapping a repeatable architecture

· Bare-Metal Provisioning Scale-Out File Server Cluster and Storage Spaces

· Provisioning Synthetic Fibre Channel in Guest VMs using VMM

· Guest Clustering with Shared VHDXs

· VMM Integration with IP Address Management ( IPAM )

· Hybrid Networking with Windows Azure Pack and System Center 2012 R2 VMM

· Windows Azure Hyper-V Recovery Manager

· Delegating Access Per Private Cloud

· OM Dashboard for VMM Fabric Monitoring

Fire Power of System Center: Licensing System Center 2012 R2

System Center 2012 R2 has two version: Data Center and Standard. Both version is comprised with the following components

· Operations Manager

· Configuration Manager

· Data Protection Manager

· Service Manager

· Virtual Machine Manager

· Endpoint Protection

· Orchestrator

· App Controller

System Center license is per processor based license. Cost of System Center 2012 R2 data center is USD 3607 and cost of System Center 2012 R2 Standard is USD1323. System Center license comes with a SQL Server standard edition license. This SQL server can only be used for System Center purpose. You can virtualized unlimited number of VMs in SC 2012 R2 data center edition.

Comparing Server 2008 R2 and Server 2012 R2 in terms of virtualization.

Hyper-v is not the same as you knew in Windows Server 2008. To clear fog of your mind about Hyper-v, the following table shows the improvement Microsoft has made over the years.

Comparing VMware with Windows Server 2012 R2

While VMware still number one in Hypervisor markets but the Redmond giant can also leverage on almost a billion Windows OS user globally, as well as its expertise in software and a robust range of services (including Azure, Bing, MSN, Office 365, Skype and many more). A new battle ground is ready between Microsoft and VMware would make 2014 a pivotal hybrid cloud year. The hybrid cloud could indeed give Microsoft the chance to prevail in ways that it couldn’t with the launch of Hyper-V; Hyper-V’s market share has been gradually increasing since early 2011. According to Gartner, Microsoft gained 28% Hypervisor market share last year.

Let’s dig deeper into comparison….

The following comparison is based on Windows Server 2012 R2 Data Center edition and System Center 2012 R2 Data Center edition Vs vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus and vCenter Server 5.5.

Licensing:

Options

Microsoft

VMware

# of Physical CPUs per License

2

1

# of Managed OSE’s per License

Unlimited

Unlimited

# of Windows Server VM Licenses per Host

Unlimited

0

Includes Anti-virus / Anti-malware protection

Yes

Yes

Includes full SQL Database Server licenses for management databases

Yes

No

Database, Hosts & VMs

A single database license is enough for 1,000 hosts and 25,000 VMs per management server.

Purchase additional database server licenses to scale beyond managing 100 hosts and 3,000 VMs with vCenter Server Appliance.

Includes licensing for Enterprise Operations Monitoring and Management of hosts, guest VMs and application workloads running within VMs.

Yes

No 

Includes licensing for Private Cloud Management capabilities – pooled resources, self-service, delegation, automation, elasticity, chargeback

Yes

No

Includes management tools for provisioning and managing VDI solutions for virtualized Windows desktops.

Yes

No

Includes web-based management console

Yes

Yes

Virtualization Scalability:

Options

Microsoft

VMware

Maximum # of Logical Processors per Host

320

320

Maximum Physical RAM per Host

4TB

4TB

Maximum Active VMs per Host

1,024

512

Maximum Virtual CPUs per VM

64

64

Hot-Adjust Virtual CPU Resources to VM

Yes

Yes

Maximum Virtual RAM per VM

1TB

1TB

Hot-Add Virtual RAM to VM

Yes

Yes

Dynamic Memory Management

Yes

Yes.

Guest NUMA Support

Yes

Yes

Maximum # of physical Hosts per Cluster

64

32

Maximum # of VMs per Cluster

8,000

4,000

Virtual Machine Snapshots

Yes

Yes

No of Snapshot Per VMS

50

32

Integrated Application Load Balancing for Scaling-Out Application Tiers

Yes

No

Bare metal deployment of new Hypervisor hosts and clusters

Yes

Yes

Bare metal deployment of new Storage hosts and clusters

Yes

No

Manage GPU Virtualization for Advanced VDI Graphics

Yes

Yes

Virtualization of USB devices

Yes

Yes

Virtualization of Serial Ports

Yes

Yes

Minimum Disk Footprint while still providing management of multiple virtualization hosts and guest VM’s

~800KB – Micro-kernelized hypervisor ( Ring -1 )
~5GB – Drivers + Management ( Parent Partition – Ring 0 + 3 )

~155MB – Monolithic hypervisor w/ Drivers( Ring -1 + 0 )
~4GB – Management  ( vCenter Server Appliance – Ring 3 )

Boot from Flash

Yes

Yes

Boot from SAN

Yes

Yes

VM Portability, High Availability and Disaster Recovery:

 Features

Microsoft

VMware

Live Migration of running VMs

Yes

Yes

Live Migration of running VMs without shared storage between hosts

Yes

Yes

Live Migration using compression of VM memory state

Yes

No

Live Migration over RDMA-enabled network adapters

Yes

No

Live Migration of VMs Clustered with Windows Server Failover Clustering (MSCS Guest Cluster)

Yes

No

Highly Available VMs

Yes

Yes

Failover Prioritization of Highly Available VMs

Yes

Yes

Affinity Rules for Highly Available VMs

Yes

Yes

Cluster-Aware Updating for Orchestrated Patch Management of Hosts.

Yes

Yes.

Guest OS Application Monitoring for Highly Available VMs

Yes

Yes

VM Guest Clustering via Shared Virtual Hard Disk files

Yes

Yes

Maximum # of Nodes per VM Guest Cluster

64

5

Intelligent Placement of new VM workloads

Yes

Yes

Automated Load Balancing of VM Workloads across Hosts

Yes

Yes

Power Optimization of Hosts when load-balancing VMs

Yes

Yes

Fault Tolerant VMs

No

Yes

Backup VMs and Applications

Yes

Yes.

Site-to-Site Asynchronous VM Replication

Yes

Yes

Storage:

Features

Microsoft

VMware

Maximum # Virtual SCSI Hard Disks per VM

256

60 ( PVSCSI )
120 (
Virtual SATA )

Maximum Size per Virtual Hard Disk

64TB

62TB

Native 4K Disk Support

Yes

No

Boot VM from Virtual SCSI disks

Yes

Yes

Hot-Add Virtual SCSI VM Storage for running VMs

Yes

Yes

Hot-Expand Virtual SCSI Hard Disks for running VMs

Yes

Yes

Hot-Shrink Virtual SCSI Hard Disks for running VMs

Yes

No

Storage Quality of Service

Yes

Yes

Virtual Fibre Channel to VMs

Yes

Yes.

Live Migrate Virtual Storage for running VMs

Yes

Yes

Flash-based Read Cache

Yes

Yes

Flash-based Write-back Cache

Yes

No

SAN-like Storage Virtualization using commodity hard disks.

Yes

No

Automated Tiered Storage between SSD and HDD using commodity hard disks.

Yes

No

Can consume storage via iSCSI, NFS, Fibre Channel and SMB 3.0.

Yes

Yes

Can present storage via iSCSI, NFS and SMB 3.0.

Yes

No

Storage Multipathing

Yes

Yes

SAN Offload Capability

Yes

Yes

Thin Provisioning and Trim Storage

Yes

Yes

Storage Encryption

Yes

No

Deduplication of storage used by running VMs

Yes

No

Provision VM Storage based on Storage Classifications

Yes

Yes

Dynamically balance and re-balance storage load based on demands

Yes

Yes

Integrated Provisioning and Management of Shared Storage

Yes

No

Networking:

 Features

Microsoft

VMware

Distributed Switches across Hosts

Yes

Yes

Extensible Virtual Switches

Yes

Replaceable, not extensible

NIC Teaming

Yes

Yes

No of NICs

32

32

Private VLANs (PVLAN)

Yes

Yes

ARP Spoofing Protection

Yes

No

DHCP Snooping Protection

Yes

No

Router Advertisement Guard Protection

Yes

No

Virtual Port ACLs

Yes

Yes

Trunk Mode to VMs

Yes

Yes

Port Monitoring

Yes

Yes

Port Mirroring

Yes

Yes

Dynamic Virtual Machine Queue

Yes

Yes

IPsec Task Offload

Yes

No

Single Root IO Virtualization (SR-IOV)

Yes

Yes

Virtual Receive Side Scaling ( Virtual RSS )

Yes

Yes

Network Quality of Service

Yes

Yes

Network Virtualization / Software-Defined Networking (SDN)

Yes

No

Integrated Network Management of both Virtual and Physical Network components

Yes

No

Virtualized Operating Systems Support: 

Operating Systems

Microsoft

VMware

Windows Server 2012 R2

Yes

Yes

Windows 8.1

Yes

Yes

Windows Server 2012

Yes

Yes

Windows 8

Yes

Yes

Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1

Yes

Yes

Windows Server 2008 R2

Yes

Yes

Windows 7 with SP1

Yes

Yes

Windows 7

Yes

Yes

Windows Server 2008 SP2

Yes

Yes

Windows Home Server 2011

Yes

No

Windows Small Business Server 2011

Yes

No

Windows Vista with SP2

Yes

Yes

Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2

Yes

Yes

Windows Server 2003 SP2

Yes

Yes

Windows XP with SP3

Yes

Yes

Windows XP x64 with SP2

Yes

Yes

CentOS 5.7, 5.8, 6.0 – 6.4

Yes

Yes

CentOS Desktop 5.7, 5.8, 6.0 – 6.4

Yes

Yes

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.7, 5.8, 6.0 – 6.4

Yes

Yes

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 5.7, 5.8, 6.0 – 6.4

Yes

Yes

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP2 & SP3

Yes

Yes

SUS Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP2 & SP3

Yes

Yes

OpenSUSE 12.1

Yes

Yes

Ubuntu 12.04, 12.10, 13.10

Yes

Yes

Ubuntu Desktop 12.04, 12.10, 13.10

Yes

Yes

Oracle Linux 6.4

Yes

Yes

Mac OS X 10.7.x & 10.8.x

No

Yes

Sun Solaris 10

No

Yes

Windows Azure:

Here are a special factors that put Microsoft ahead of VMware: Microsoft Azure for on-premises and service provider cloud.

Windows Azure Pack is shipping with Windows Server 2012 R2. The Azure code will enable high-scale hosting and management of web and virtual machines.

Microsoft is leveraging its service provider expertise and footprint for Azure development while extending Azure into data centers on Windows servers. That gives Microsoft access to most if not all of the world’s data centers. It could become a powerhouse in months instead of years. Widespread adoption of Microsoft Azure platform gives Microsoft a winning age against competitor like VMware.

On premises client install Windows Azure pack to manage their system center 2012 R2 and use Azure as self-service and administration portal for IT department and department within organization. To gain similar functionality in VMware you have to buy vCloud Director, Chargeback and vShield separately.

Conclusion:

This is a clash of titanic proportion in between Microsoft and VMware. Ultimately end user and customer will be the winner. Both companies are thriving for new innovation in Hypervisor and virtualization market place. End user will enjoy new technology and business will gain from price battle between Microsoft and VMware. These two key components could significantly increase the adoption of hybrid cloud operating models. Microsoft has another term cards for cloud service provider which is Exchange 2013 and Lync 2013. Exchange 2013 and Lync 2013 are already widely used for Software as a Service (SaaS). VMware has nothing to offer in Messaging and collaboration platform. Microsoft could become for the cloud what it became for the PC. It could enforce consistency across clouds to an extent that perhaps no other player could. As the cloud shifts from infrastructure to apps, Microsoft could be in an increasingly powerful position and increase Hyper-v share even further by adding SaaS to its product line. History will repeat once again when Microsoft defeat VMware as Microsoft defeated Novell eDirectory, Corel WordPerfect and IBM Notes.

References:

http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2013/10/15/vmware-or-microsoft-comparing-vsphere-5-5-and-windows-server-2012-r2-at-a-glance.aspx#.UxaKbYXazIV

http://www.datacentertcotool.com/

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/solutions/virtualization.aspx#fbid=xrWmRt7RXCi

http://wikibon.org/wiki/v/VMware_vs_Microsoft:_It%27s_time_to_stop_the_madness

http://www.infoworld.com/d/microsoft-windows/7-ways-windows-server-2012-pays-itself-205092

http://www.trefis.com/stock/vmw/articles/221206/growing-competition-for-vmware-in-virtualization-market/2014-01-07

Supported Server and Client Guest Operating Systems on Hyper-V

Compatibility Guide for Guest Operating Systems Supported on VMware vSphere

vSphere 5.5 is Catching Up with Hyper-v 2012 R2

Is VMware catching up with Microsoft? Yes you heard correct. I said “VMware is catching up with Microsoft” VMware released a latest update vSphere 5.5 to catch up with Microsoft Windows server 2012 R2. Here is a short comparison of VMware improvement to catch up with Hyper-v 2012 R2.

Options

vSphere 5.5

Hyper-v 2012 R2

Host CPU Core

320 (Previous version 160)

320

vCPU/Host

2048

2,048

vCPU/Guest

64 (Previous version 8)

64

Host Memory

4TB (Previous version 2TB)

4TB

vRAM/VM

1TB (Previous version 32GB)

1TB

VM/Host

2048 (previous version512)

2048

Maximum Node

32

64

Max VM/Cluster

4000

8,000

Networking

Link Aggregation Control Protocol Enhancements

Traffic Filtering

Quality of Service Tagging

SR-IOV Enhancements

Enhanced Host-Level Packet Capture

40GB NIC support

10GigE Simultaneous Live Migrations is only for 8 Vms

Support for SR-IOV networking devices

Dynamic Virtual Machine Queue (D-VMQ)

Accelerating Network I/O

IPsec Task Offload for Virtual Machines

Metering virtual machine use in a multitenant environment

IP Address Management (IPAM)

Hyper-V Network Virtualization

Hyper-V Extensible Switch

Quality of Service (QoS)

Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) WAN Optimizations

WebSocket Protocol

Server Name Indicator (SNI)

Direct Access and VPN

Private VLANS (PVLANS)

Trunk Mode to Virtual Machines

Unlimited 10GigE Simultaneous Live Migrations

Site-to-site network connections using private IP address

Cisco NVGRE (Network Virtualization using Generic Routing Encapsulation)

Storage

Support for 62TB VMDK

MSCS Updates

vSphere 5.1 Feature Updates

16GB E2E support

PDL AutoRemove

vSphere Replication Interoperability

vSphere Replication Multi-Point-in-Time Snapshot Retention

vSphere Flash Read Cache

64TB VMFS

64TB RDM

64TB VHDX

VHD de-duplication

high availability, performance, reliability, and scalability features on inexpensive commodity storage

Offloaded Data Transfer (ODX)

Resilient File System

Deploy large NTFS volumes

Thin Provisioning and

And Trim

Cluster Shared Volume version 2

iSCSI Software Target

Support for VMware Virtual Machines and NFS 4.1

High Performance Highly Available Storage with SMB

SMB Scale-Out

Virtual Fiber Channel

256TB+ pass through disk (RDM)

Local Storage

64TB (Previous version 2TB)

64TB

Dynamic Memory

Yes

Yes

Resource Metering

Yes (Previous version No)

Yes

Hardware GPU

Yes (Previous version No)

Yes

Unified VDI

No. Buy VMware View

yes

Guest OS Application monitoring

Yes (Previous version No)

yes

Incremental Backups

Yes (Previous version No)

yes

VM Replication

Yes (Previous version No)

yes

Guest Clustering with Dynamic Memory

No

yes

Multi-tenant

No (Buy VMware vCloud)

yes

VMware goes after biz critical apps with vSphere 5.5

VMware what’s New

Windows Server 2012 R2 what’s New

Microsoft Virtual Machine Converter: Switching from vSphere to Hyper-v Made Easy

    Are you having difficulty funding a renewal license of expensive VMware vSphere? There is an alternative brand that adds greater value to the business reducing costs, and accelerating your journey to the cloud. Making the shift from VMware to Microsoft could be the wise decision you ever made after years of working as a CIO or IS Manager. By migrating from VMware to Microsoft, you gain a unified infrastructure licensing model and simplified vendor management, off course it gives you less pain in your wallet too.
    Whether you are looking to add value to your organisation, save cost, support grown or you are a fanatical environmentalist reducing carbon foot print, Hyper-V is the correct choice for you. A move to Microsoft’s virtualization and management platform can help you better meet your business needs. Simply buying Windows Server 2012 data center, you get the cloud computing benefits of unlimited virtualization and lower costs consistently and predictably over time.
    System Center 2012 enables physical, virtual, private cloud, and public cloud management using a single platform. It offers support for multi-hypervisor management, third-party integration and process management, and deep application diagnostics and insight. You can see what is happening inside the performance of your applications, remediate issues faster, and achieve increased agility for your organization.
    With the help of free tools like Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit (MAP), and with the Microsoft Virtual Machine Converter (MVMC), you can quickly, easily and safely migrate over to Hyper-V.  For enterprise customers with large numbers of virtual machines to migrate, the Migration Automation Toolkit (MAT) provides the scalability to handle mass migrations in an automated fashion. System Center 2012 and Hyper-v Server 2012 support guest virtual machine of all major Linux and Unix distribution inclusive Microsoft OS off course.
    In a nutshell Microsoft Virtual Machine Converter:
  • Provides a quick, low-risk option for VMware customers to evaluate Hyper-V.
  • Converts VMware virtual machines to Hyper-V virtual machines.
  • Convert virtual hardware and keep same configuration of original virtual machine.
  • Supports a clean migration to Hyper-V with un-installation of VMware tools on the source virtual machine.
  • Provides GUI or scriptable CLI and Windows PowerShell, making it simple to perform virtual machine conversion.
  • Installs integration services for Windows 2003 guests that are converted to Hyper-V virtual machines.
  • Supports conversion of virtual machines from VMware vSphere 4.1 and 5.0 hosts.
  • Support migration of guest machine that is part of a failover cluster.
  • Supports offline conversions of VMware-based virtual hard disks (VMDK) to a Hyper-V-based virtual hard disk file format (.vhd file).
      • Relevant Articles
        Microsoft Virtual Machine Converter Solution Accelerator
        Migration Automation Toolkit (MAT)
        Cost Calculator
        Download Windows Server 2012
        Download System Center 2012
        Hyper-v vs vSphere
        Is VMware’s fate heading towards Novell?

        Microsoft’s Hyper-v Server 2012 and System Center 2012 Unleash KO Punch to VMware

        Hyper-V has been integral part of Windows Server 2008 and enhanced with great features in Windows Server 2012. According to Gartner’s magic quadrant Microsoft Hyper-v has been positioned in the leader category second to VMware. Combining Windows Server 2012 and System Center 2012 provide you a high performance Cloud Technology. Microsoft licensing model is highly flexible and charges only by physical processors and offer unlimited virtualization rights with Datacenter editions. With Hyper-v, your return on investment (ROI) increases as your workload density increases.

        Pricing Comparison:

        The pricing is based on the following assumptions:

        • Average consolidation ratio of 12 VMs per physical processor.
        • Number of physical hosts required 21. Each physical host contains 2 physical processors with six cores each.
        • Three years License and Maintenance; VMware cost includes Windows Server 2012 Datacenter edition for running guests
        • costs do not include hardware, storage or project cost
        • Pricing is based on published US prices for VMware and Microsoft as of September, 2012.
        • The cost above doesn’t include Microsoft Windows Server license cost for guest operating system.
        • Windows Server 2012 Datacenter allows you to run unlimited Windows Server 2012 on Hyper-v Server 2012 host.

        Server Virtualization Environment:

        image

        Pricing Summary:

        image

        Microsoft Server Virtualization Cost break-down

        image

        VMware Server Virtualization Cost break-down

        image

        Features VS Cost Breakdown- Multi-Site Private Cloud Computing

        Together with Windows Server 2012 and System Center 2012 is truly a cloud and datacenter management solution with eight separate components such as management, monitoring, provisioning, disaster recovery integrated into one unified product. A unified System Center management solution delivers greater OPEX cost savings than VMware in addition to CAPEX cost savings.

        image

        Number Game:

        image

        Breakdown in resources (/Host/Guest/Cluster):

        image

        Network Virtualization

         image

        DR Solutions

        image

        Truth about VMware lies:

        You don’t have to be Einstein to understand that VMware is in significant pressure from all sides. Hence they are misleading Cloud market with biased information. I would strongly recommend you to assess your business position, compare apple to apple before renewing/buying your next Cloud products. Though VMware is still no.1 player in Cloud Computing market but their fear is real that VMware loyal Customer is switching continuously to Microsoft Cloud Technology. A declining enterprise market leads them to spread the following one sided information.

        1. VMware claim: VMware vSphere 5.1 can achieve an 18.9% higher VM density per host than with Microsoft Hyper-V.

        Facts: In one of VMware’s own tests, when provided adequate memory to support the number of users the performance variance between vSphere 5.1 and Hyper-V R2 SP1 was only 2% (using 24VM’s).

        2. VMware claim: Hyper-V performance is poor. If performance is important to you, choose VMware.

        Facts: In reality, Hyper-V offers near-native levels of virtualization performance, for which there are multiple supporting proof points (including independent third party validations):

        • Enterprise Strategy Group Report (2011) – SharePoint, Exchange, & SQL on Hyper-V Host.
        • Microsoft & Intel – 700,000 IOPS to a VM | Near Native with VMq: Windows Server and Hyper-V are not a limiting factor to IO performance. There shouldn’t be any significant concern around IO for virtualizing with Hyper-V.
        • Project Virtual Reality Check (Terminal Services on Hyper-V).

        3. VMware claim: Hyper-V isn’t ready for the enterprise. It can’t handle the most intensive of workloads like VMware can.

        Facts: Hyper-V offers near native levels of performance for key workloads, ensuring that customers can virtualize their mission critical, high-performance applications and workloads with confidence on Hyper-V. Additionally, a growing number of enterprise customers are running their businesses on Microsoft Hyper-V. Please read Microsoft Private Cloud success stories.

        4. VMware claim: Hyper-V is lacking some of the key VMware features today. Features such as vMotion, HA, Memory Overcommit, DRS, Storage vMotion and Hot-Add are important features for us, and Hyper-V simple doesn’t come close.

        Facts: Hyper-V R2 SP1 and System Center 2012 provide Live Migration, High Availability, Storage Live Migration, Dynamic Memory Allocation, Hot-Add and subsequent removal of storage.

        5. VMware claim: VMware vSphere 5.1 is more secure than Hyper-V because it’s architecture and small code base.

        Facts: Small footprint doesn’t equal a more secure hypervisor. Both vSphere and Hyper-V use the same memory footprint to run. The disk Footprint in ESXi 5.0 (144 MB) doubled from ESXi 4.0 (70 MB). Microsoft follows the rigorous, industry-leading Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL) for all its products. It is possible to achieve a 40-60% reduction in patches using Server Core based on historical data.

        6. VMware claim: There is no virtual firewall in Hyper-V while VMware provides vShield Zones.

        Facts: Windows Server 2012 also includes an integrated firewall with advanced security features. An old version of vShield Zones is included with vSphere 5.1 (details here) and vShield Zones has several limitations like every VM’s traffic passes through the Zones virtual appliances which slows down the traffic.

        7. VMware claim: Microsoft doesn’t offer anything comparable to VMware Fault Tolerance.

        Facts: VMware Fault Tolerance has limited applicability and severe limitations. It cannot function with:

        • Thin Provisioning and Linked Clones
        • Storage vMotion
        • Hot plug devices and USB Pass-through
        • IPv6
        • vSMP
        • N-Port ID Virtualization (NPIV)
        • Serial/parallel ports
        • Physical and remote CD/floppy drives
        • no more than 4 FT VMs per host be used

        8. VMware claim: VMware significantly support for Linux operating systems than Hyper-V.

        Facts: In production environment, Hyper-v supports Microsoft Windows Server and Linux Server without modifying any guest operating systems or installing tools.

        9. VMware claim: VMware supports broad applications, while Hyper-V does not.

        Facts: Since VMware does not have certified logo program for any application, they are not in position to dictate which application are supported or not. On the contrary, every single application that achieves a logo for Windows Server can be run on guest operating system on a Hyper-V, and is therefore inherently supported. There are over 2500 ISV applications listed on Microsoft Pinpoint that work with Hyper-V. Truth is neither Microsoft nor VMware mention which application you can install on a guest operating systems. It’s completely up to you what you would like to run on guest operating systems.

        10. VMware claim: VMware’s Site Recovery Manager (SRM) enables us to simplify our DR story, and provides us with a solution to not only perform a planned failover, but test it whenever we like. Microsoft simply can’t deliver an alternative to this.

        Facts: System Center 2012 components like Data Protection Manager and Orchestrator can provide tailored DR solutions. Windows Server 2012 includes an inbox replication capability, Hyper-V Replica, at no cost.

        11. VMware claim: Microsoft Hyper-v isn’t ready for Hoster or Service Provider.

        Facts: Hyper-v has been adopted by service provider industry to host their own infrastructure and public cloud simultaneously on Hyper-v utilizing Microsoft Network Virtualization. Click here and filter using hosting and public cloud to find the list of hoster. Examples: hostway, softsyshosting , hyper-v-mart , geekhosting , BlueFire and many more.

        12. VMware Claim: Hyper-v does not fully comply with Trunking, VLANs

        Facts: Microsoft Network virtualization is more advanced than VMware standard Switch and DV Switch. Microsoft Hyper-v is fully compliant with 802.1q trunking, VLANs, VIP, networking Tunneling, multitenant IP management. VMware is catching up on network virtualization. Being in back foot VMware advertised to hire a PR professional to campaign on network virtualization.

        Bottom-line: Why Selecting Hyper-v Over VMware

        Other than cost savings, the following reasons why you should select Hyper-V and System Center 2012 over VMware vSphere 5.1

        1. Built-in Virtualization: Hyper-V is an integral part of Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2012

        2. Familiarity with Windows: In-house IT staff can utilize their familiarity and knowledge of Windows environment to deploy Hyper-v minimizing training cost and learning time.

        3. Single Platform Cloud Management Technology: System Center 2012 enables you to manage physical, virtual, private and public cloud using a common console view for multi-hypervisor management, 3rd party integration and process automation, ability to manage applications via a single view across private and public clouds, and deep application diagnostics and insights.

        4. Running common Microsoft Application: It is obvious that Microsoft application will run better on Hyper-v 2012. Still Microsoft has published third-party validated lab results that prove best-in-class performance for Microsoft workloads on Hyper-V.

        5. Private, Public or Hybrid Cloud: Microsoft provides complete solutions for Private, Public or Hybrid cloud with next generation computing technology like IaaS, PaaS, SaaS.

        6. Value for Money: Microsoft Private Cloud provides value for money. You will receive unrestricted virtualization license once you buy Windows Server 2012 Datacenter and System Center 2012.

        7. Easy Migration: Convert VMware virtual machine to Microsoft Hyper-v virtual machine in few easy steps. See this link.

        8. Single Vendor: Since your existing virtualization workload is mostly Windows Server, from vendor communication and contract management point of view, having Microsoft Hyper-v make more sense.

        References:

        Microsoft Cloud Summit Australia

        Microsoft Private Cloud Cost Calculator

        Microsoft Private Cloud Success Stories

        Microsoft Cloud Computing

        System Center 2012

        Windows Server 2012

        Hyper-v Server 2012

        Download Microsoft System Center Private Cloud Evaluation Software